Submit Paper

Article Processing Fee

Pay Online

           

Crossref logo

  DOI Prefix   10.20431


 

ARC Journal of Anesthesiology
Volume-1 Issue-3, 2016, Page No: 35-43

Evaluation of the Relationship of Serum Lactate Concentration and Blood pH on Surgical Wound Healing in Cats Submitted to Total Mastectomy as an Animal Model

L.Miguel Carreira 1,2,3,4, Ana Rita Ramalho 3, Pedro Azevedo 3

1.Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinic, Surgery, University of Lisbon (FMV/ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal
2.Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health (CIISA), FMV/ULisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
3.Anjos of Assis Veterinary Medicine Centre (CMVAA), Barreiro, Portugal 4Private Practice in Human Dentistry, Lisbon, Portugal

Citation : Carreira LM, Ramalho AR, Azevedo P. Evaluation of the Relationship of Serum Lactate Concentration and Blood pH on Surgical Wound Healing in Cats Submitted to Total Mastectomy as an Animal Model. ARC Journal of Anesthesiology. 2016;1(3):35–43.
DOI: dx.doi.org/10.20431/2455-9792.0103005

Copyright : © 2016 Carreira LM. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract


Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the relationship of serum lactate concentration and blood pH on surgical wound healing, using as animal model a sample of 40 female cats(n=40) with diagnosis of mammary gland neoplasia and submitted to unilateral total mastectomy.

Methods:Three different time points were considered: T0(immediately pre-surgery), T0A(24 hours aftersurgery) and T1(8 days after-surgery). At T0 and T1 the serum lactate and blood pH were analysed. At T0A and T1 the edema and erythema parameters of the surgical wound were evaluated. Three different levels of the wound healing were evaluated at T1 according to the number of stitches removed.

Results:The lactate concentrations were higher in T1 than in T0, contrary to blood pH. Correlations between tissue healing level and the serum lactate, blood pH, edema and erythema were weak (r<0.39 for all).

Conclusions and relevance: It was not possible to establish any relationship between serum lactate concentration and blood pH with the wound healing level, due to the fact that skin pH is not directly influenced by the blood pH. Considering this, the wound healing process is mainly dependent from the injured tissues pH, which can influence directly and indirectly the different steps of the healing process.

Keywords: Cats; Serum Lactate Concentration; Blood Ph; Wound; Healing Process.


1. Introduction


Wound healing is a complex physiological process, of great importance in surgery and medicine, involving tissue repair and regeneration and aiming to restore the normal function and structural integrity of tissues after lesional stimulation [1-4].It can be described as evolving different and very dynamic phases or stages.[5] Generally, four overlapping phases are considered, as follows: 1) the haemostasis and coagulation phase; 2) the inflammatory phase; the 3) proliferative phase; and 4) the remodelling and maturation phase [6-14]. Recognition of these phases, based on macroscopic characteristics, allows the clinician to make an association between the microscopic and biochemical events, thereby directing procedures to the appropriate management of the lesion [5-8]. Several local and systemic (endogenous or exogenous) factors can lead to impaired healing processes [3,7,13-16] Oxygen (O2) and lactate are essential elements in all stages in the development of the tissues healing [13,15]. In combination with growth factors, lactate stimulates fibroblast proliferation and angiogenesis.[17-19] Furthermore, lactate accumulates in the wound, regardless of the O2 concentration, and will stimulate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and collagen deposition.[20, 21] During the healing process, lactate originates from 1) the fibroblasts, which increase their glycolytic enzymes in hypoxic situations, thereby producing more lactate; 2) cells in division, which produce and release more lactate; and 3) oxidative burst from the leucocytes appearing as a bioproduct.[22,23] In healthy cats, the value of lactate considered normal for daily production corresponds to values < 1.5 mmol/l, reaching 2.0 mmol/l in some particular situations. Also, lactate concentrations are affected by many different variables.[24,25] Lactate and other products are removed from the tissues by the return blood flow of venulas, promoting therefore a decrease in the pH values of venous blood, with the establishment of an acidosis in the early stages of tissue healing process.[26-28]. The present study was developed in a sample of 40 female cats (N=40) with diagnosis of mammary neoplasia and submitted to total unilateral mastectomy with lymph nodes deflation, and aimed to 1) evaluate the relationship of serum lactate concentration and blood pH on surgical wound healing in cats submitted to total mastectomy.


2. Materials and Methods


This study was conducted on a sample of 40 female subjects (n = 40) of the Felis catus specie, European Common breed, with diagnosis of mammary gland neoplasia and submitted to total unilateral mastectomy surgery. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Animal Welfare (CEBEA), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon – FMV/ULisboa, and Anjos of Assis Veterinary Medicine Centre (CMVAA), and simultaneously by the owners of the patients that signed the consent form authorisation. These animals were regular hospital patients evaluated with a surgical clinical condition, and at no time were used as experimental animals. The following study inclusion criteria were considered: all patients were aged between 8 and 14 years, neutered or non neutered but in anestro phase, the mammary nodules had diagnosed in a maximum 30-day period, with previous cytological diagnostic of mammary adenocarcinoma, a final anatomopatological diagnostic of adenocarcinoma tubulopapilary, and did not receive lactate supplementation in the 24 h before surgery, and did not present any other concurrent disease issues. Two different time points were considered during the study to harvest a volume of blood sample by venipuncture of the cephalic vein after a topical application of bupivacaine gel for routine analysis (hemogram and serum biochemistries), and to measure the serum lactate: T0 (immediately pre-surgery) and T1 (8 days after surgery). Minimal restraint of the animals was always employed. Immediately after collection, we proceeded to the analysis of the biological sample, using the i-STAT of Abbott system CG4+ with the analytical profile measuring the serum L-lactate concentration in units of mmol/l. The lactate oxidase enzyme, immobilised on the biosensor for lactate selectively, converts lactate to pyruvate and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); when released, this is oxidised in a platinum electrode to produce a current which is proportional to the lactate concentration in the test sample. The reference interval considered for this parameter was 0.90 to 1.70 mmol/l. Another time point called T0A (first 24 hours after surgery) was considered to evaluate the edema and eryhtema levels presented on surgical wound. Both parameters (edema and erythema) were evaluated from T0A to T1. The wound healing level was evaluated at T1 considering three different levels according to the fact that all, some and none stitches were removed from the surgical wound at this time point. This task was always blind and carried out by the same two researchers. Surgical procedure consisting in a total unilateral mastectomy with lymph nodes deflation associated was performed by the same surgeon for all patients, in order to reduce de bias associated with the time consuming or surgery duration, the surgical technique and the type of surgical defect extent, promoting their similarity in all cats. All patients were submitted to the same protocols consisting of the following: fluids with NaCl 0.9%, at a maintenance rate of 5 ml/kg/h; amoxicillin with clavulanic acid (10 mg/kg/Intramuscular [IM]); carprofen (4mg/kg/Subcutaneous); buprenorphine (0.02 mg/kg/IM); 2% intralesional lidocaine; and transdermal fentanyl. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 1% (4–6 mg/kg/Intravenous) and maintained with 2% isoflurane vaporised in 1 l of 100% oxygen/min. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software in version 3.0.1 and its extension R Commander. Data normality of each tested variable was achieved by using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The t- test has shown the occurrence of statistically significant changes in serum lactate, blood pH, edema and erythema values between T0/ T0A and T1. The Pearson coefficient correlation (r) was used to assess the association between all the quantitative variables. For analysis of variance we used one-way ANOVA test in order to check for statistically significant differences in serum lactate concentrations, lactate variation (lactate ΔT), and wound healing in patients subjected to total unilateral mastectomy over the time points, followed by the Post-hoc Bonferroni test. The results were considered statistically significant for p-values < 0.05.


3. Results


Characterisation of the sample according to age, body weight, serum lactate concentrations, lactate variation, blood pH, edema, erythema and wound healing level of the surgical healing are listed in Table 1. The lactate concentrations was higher in T1 (2.64 ± 0.54 mmol/l) than in T0 (1. 62 ± 0.40 mmol/l). Based on one-way ANOVA, it was possible to conclude that there were statistically significant differences between serum lactate concentrations at T0 and the blood pH, edema, erythema and wound healing level parameters (p < 0.05 for all)(Table 2). Using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r), it was possible to determine the correlation between the studied parameters at both time points considered (T0/ T0A and T1), which were moderate positive for serum lactate (r = 40), edema (r = 0.41) and erythema (r = 0.58), and strong positive for blood pH (r = 0.73)(Figure 1). For all the results were statistically significant (p < 0.01) (Table 2). The one-way ANOVA test was used to study the variance between the lactate T0 concentrations, the lactate variation from T0 to T1 (Lactate ΔT), and the wound healing level and the blood pH, and the edema and erythema parameters between T0/ T0A and T1 (Table 2). For lactate T0 and all the parameters this test showed statistically significant differences: blood pH, edema, erythema and the wound healing level of the tissues healing (p < 0.05 for all). The use of post-hoc Bonferoni test allow us to conclude that from all pairs simultaneously compared significant differences were registered between the following pairs: lactate T0/ blood pH T0 (p<0.01), lactate T0/ blood pH T1 (p<0.01), lactate T0/ blood pH ΔT (p<0.01), lactate T0/ edema T0A (p = 0.03), lactate T0/ edema T1 (p < 0.01), lactate T0/ erythema T1 (p < 0.01), and lactate T0/ wound healing level (p> 0.01)(Table 2). Correlation between serum lactate at T0 and the other parameters was weak for all the parameters, except for edema T1 which was moderate (r = 0.40) (Table 2). For lactate ΔT lactate, the one-way ANOVA test showed statistically significant differences: blood pH, edema, erythema and the wound healing level of the tissues healing (p < 0.05 for all). The post-hoc Bonferoni test allow us to registered significant differences between the following pairs: lactate ΔT / blood pH T0 (p<0.01), lactate ΔT / blood pH T1 (p<0.01), lactate ΔT / blood pH ΔT (p<0.01), lactate ΔT / edema T1 (p < 0.01), lactate ΔT / erythema T1 (p = 0.02), and lactate ΔT / wound healing level (p> 0.01)(Table 2). Correlation between serum lactate ΔT and the other parameters was weak for all the parameters, except for edema T1 which was moderate (r = 0.59) and for erythema T0A which was very strong (r = 0.86)(Table 2). According to results of one-way ANOVA test statistically significant differences were registered between the wound healing level and the blood pH, edema and erythema T0/ T0A and T1 (p <0.05). The post - hoc Bonferroni test identifyied which of the pairs were significantly different from each other. Variations were statistically significant between wound healing level and blood pH at T0 (p <0.01), T1 (p < 0.01) and ΔT (p = 0.04), the edema at T0A and T1 (p < 0.01 for both), and erythema T0A (p< 0.01)(Table 2). Correlation between wound healing level and the other parameters was weak for all the parameters (r <39 for all) (Table 2).


     


4.Discussion


A mastectomy is a surgical procedure characterised by the exeresis of a variable amount of mammary gland tissue, and represents the first choice and the main approach for treating mammary neoplasia.[29] This type of cancer is the third most common in cats,26 occurring in middle-aged to old animals between 8 and 12 years, and about 90% of neoplasms are malignant.[30-32] The mean age of the patients sample (11.1 years old) was within the interval cited by the literature, as well as for the histopathological neoplasm characterisation, considering that all patients of the sample presented a tubular adenocarcinoma which in cats, represents the most frequent type of mammary gland tumors.[33] These cats were subjected to the same surgical procedure performed by the same surgeon, showing therefore similar results regarding the extent of the surgical defect and the surgery duration. In this study, serum lactate was measured in the pre-operative phase (T0) and 8 days after surgery (T1) in patients submitted to total unilateral mastectomy surgery. Considering that the mean period of time necessary for a wound being totally cover by granulated tissue during the healing process is about 7.5 to 10 days in the cat,[34-39] T1 time point was considered as 8 days after surgery, allowing us to investigate a possible correlation between the serum lactate concentrations and blood pH with the wound healing process in each patient. Blood sample analysis was performed using the i-STAT from Abbott with the analytical profile CG4+ system; with its pH reading, this allows the L-lactate concentrations to be adjusted to a neutral pH (7.4). Lactate concentrations are affected by many different variables. In order to avoid potential changes in lactate either during or after sample blood collection, special procedures should be carried out. In the study we used venous blood samples in order to evaluate the acid–base balance, since they are easier to obtain and more accurately reflect the body's real metabolic state. [25] Considering that cats are very sensitive to stress, which may promote higher lactate concentrations, the venous blood samples used were collected in a calm environment with minimal restraint of the animals, without using a tourniquet or immediately after its application due to the anaerobic environment that is created. All the samples were analysed immediately after collection, because the lactate can increase by 70% within 30 minutes at 25ᵒC as a result of glycolysis.[40] With the descriptive analysis of the lactate evaluated with the i-STAT system using CG4+, it was found that serum lactate concentration rise after the mastectomy procedure. At T0, the patients presented an average which is within the reference interval, contrary to the average lactate value at T1 that was higher than the maximum reference value.[24, 41] This rise in sample was registered in all individuals. Comparing the lactate concentrations obtained at T0 with those obtained at T1, a moderate positive correlation (p = 0.40) statistically significant (p < 0.01) between the difference in lactate concentrations was achieved. This phenomenon may occur due the lactate T1 values might be influenced by the baseline lactate T0 values. Assuming this, only the lactate T0 concentrations and the lactate variation (ΔT) were used in the study. Patients at T0 presented an average lactate value of 1.62 mmol/L, which is within the reference interval; contrary to patients at T1 which showed an average lactate value of 2.64 mmol/L, showing that patients submitted to total unilateral mastectomy with lymph nodes deflation exhibited hyperlactatemia 8 days after surgery. pH is an important acidity or alkalinity indicator of normal blood. All changes in blood pH, in physiological and pathological conditions, occur through variations in three major variables: the CO2, the electrolyte concentrations, and total weak acid concentrations.[26, 42] When CO2 elimination is inadequate relative to the rate of tissue production, will going to increase the H+ concentration inducing a decrease in the pH value.[43-52] pH values below 7.35 are associated with acidaemia, whereas values higher than 7.45 are indicative of alkalaemia (7.4 is considered neutral)[49]. According to the results, the average of the blood pH at T0 (7.32) was within the reference interval, but slightly below at T1 (7.24) and therefore, patients presented slight acidaemia at T1. It is known that blood and tissues pH has a strong impact on cellular functions, enzymatic activity, protein expression and conformation, etc. In intact skin, different products such as the CO2 from oxidative respiration, and the lactate from anaerobic respiration, are removed from the tissues by the return flow of venous blood. An indicator of this is the lower venous blood pH compared to the arterial blood pH.[53, 54] When a decrease of tissue blood flow occurs, such as in surgical wounds, ischemia will lead to a lactate increase with an inadequate extraction of metabolites promoting a decrease the local pH level,[26, 55, 56] which will promote angiogenesis of injured tissues.[57] Also the tissue hypoxia serves as a physiological sign to drive angiogenic response, and to raise lactate production and lower pH.[43, 58, 59] To assess the healing process, we decided to consider two major signs of inflammatory tissues response, the edema and erythema; which decrease in their final score over time.

To characterize the final wound healing level at T1 we only considered the fact of all, some and none stitches were removed. From the sample, only one (n=1) patient didn't removed stitches, and three (n=3) removed some stitches, all the others (n= 36) removed all the stitches. According to the results, correlations between the lactate T0 concentration and lactate ΔT and the blood pH were weak (r < 39 for all). The same was achieve for correlations between the wound healing level and lactate T0 (r = 0.11) and lactate ΔT (r = 0.04); and wound healing level and blood pH T0 (r = 0.38) and blood pH T1 (r = 0.32).

We can conclude that in cats, it is not possible to establish any relationship between lactate concentration and blood pH with the wound healing level presented by the injured tissues. The main reason for this may be associated with the fact that skin pH is not directly influenced by the blood pH, which presents a very complex system that tightly controls the general body acid-base balance [60-62]. Considering this, the tissues healing process is mainly dependent from the injured tissues pH, which can influence directly and indirectly the different steps of the healing process, and various parameters such as oxygen dissociation, angiogenesis, protease activity, and histotoxicity of bacterial end products,[43,53, 63-65] than on serum lactate concentration and blood pH.


5.Acknowledgments


The authors thank to the Editor of the ARC Journal of Anesthesia for his support allowing having this ARC-Free article submission; to Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health – CIISA, of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Lisbon, of the University of Lisbon – Portugal (FMV-ULisboa); and to Anjos of Assis Veterinary Medicine Centre (CMVAA), Barreiro – Portugal.


References


  1. Saarto EE, Hielm-Björkman AK, Hette K, Kuusela EK, Brandão CVS. (2010). Effect of a single acupuncture treatment on surgical wound healing in dogs: a randomized , single blinded , controlled pilot study. Acta Vet Scand:52–57.
  2. Mayo E. (2012). Acupuncture and Wound Healing. American Journal of Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine;7 (1):45–52.
  3. Cornell K. Wound Healing. (2012). In: Tobias KM & Johnston SA (eds.), Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal.1st ed. Missouri, USA: Elsevier Saunders,:125–134.
  4. Nagoba BS, Suryawanshi NM, Wadher B, Selkar S. (2015).Acidic environment and wound healing- A review. Wounds;27(1):5-11)
  5. Hosgood G. (2003).Wound repair and specific tissue responde to injury. In: Slatter D. (ed.), Textbook of Small Animal Surgery.3rd ed. Philadelphia, USA: Saunders, Elsevier,:66–86
  6. Hosgood G. (2009).The biology of wound healing. In: Williams J & Moores A (Eeds.), BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Wound Management and Reconstruction. 2nd ed.Gloucester, UK: British Small Animal Veterinary Association,: 1–14
  7. Carreira LM, Azevedo P. (2016).Comparison of the Influence of CO2-laser and Scalpel Skin Incisions on the Surgical Wound Healing Process. ARC Journal of Anesthesiology; 1(3):18.
    DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2455-9792.0103001
  8. Schreml S, Szeimies RM., Karrer S, Heinlin J, Landthaler M, Babilas P. (2010). The impact of the pH value on skin integrity and cutaneous wound healing. JEADV.;24 (4):373–8
  9. Rivera AE, Spencer JM. (2007). Clinical aspects of full-thickness wound healing. Clin Dermatol.;25 (1):39–48.
  10. Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V. (2009). The Wound Healing Process: An Overview of the Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms. J Int Med Res.;37(5):1528–1542.
  11. Pavletic MM. (2010). Basic Principles of Wound Healing. In: Atlas of Small Animal Wound Management and Reconstructive Surgery. 3rd ed. Iowa, USA:Wiley-Blackwell.
  12. Porth CM, Gaspard KJ. (2010). Alterations in hemostasis and blood coagulation. In: Porth CM. (ed.): Essentials of Pathophysiology: Concepts of Altered Health States.3rd ed.Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.: 205–215
  13. Young A, McNaught C. (2011). The physiology of wound healing. Surgery.;29(10):475–479.
  14. Ackermann MR. (2012). Inflammation and healing. In: Zachary JF & McGavin MD. (eds.), Pathologic Basis of Veterinary Disease .5th ed.Missouri, USA: Mosby , Elsevier.:89–146
  15. Rodriguez PG, Felix FN, Woodley DT, Shim EK. (2008). The role of oxygen in wound healing: a review of the literature. Dermatol Surg.;34 (9):1159–1169.
  16. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N. (2005). Tissue renewal and repair: regeneration, healing, and fibrosis. In: Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier.:87–118
  17. Gottrup F. (2002). Oxygen, wound healing and the development of infection: present status. Eur J Surg.;168(4):260–263.
  18. Gottrup F. (2004). Oxygen in wound healing and infection. World J Surg.;28 (3):312–315.
  19. Hopf HW, Rollins MD. (2007). Wounds: an overview of the role of oxygen. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling.;9 (8):1183–1191.
  20. Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko MS, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. (2008). Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 16 (5): 585–601.
  21. Werner S, Grose R. (2003). Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiological Reviews, 83 (3): 835–70.
  22. James JH, Luchette FA, Mccarter FD, Fischer JE. (1990). Lactate is an unreliable indicator of tissue hypoxia in injury or sepsis. The Lancet.; 354:505–508.
  23. Trabold O, Wagner S, Wicke C, Scheuenstuhl H, Hussain MZ, Rosen N, Hunt TK. (2003). Lactate and oxygen constitute a fundamental regulatory mechanism in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen.;11 (6):504–509.
  24. Christopher MM, O'Neill S. (2000). Effect of specimen collection and storage on blood glucose and lactate concentrations in healthy, hyperthyroid and diabetic cats. Vet Clin Pathol.; 29(1):22– 28.
  25. Mathews KA. (2006). Lactate. In Veterinary Emergency Critical Care Manual. 2nd ed.Ontario, Canada: Lifelearn Inc.: 400–403
  26. Cao TM, Takatani T, King MR. (2013). Effect of Extracellular pH on Selectin Adhesion: Theory and Experiment. Biophysical Journal.;104(2):292-299. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.005;
  27. Lengheden A., Jansson L. (1995). pH effects on experimental wound healing of human fibroblasts in vitro. Eur. J. Oral Sci.;103:148–155.
  28. Liu Y., Kalén A., Wahlström O. (2002). Fibroblast proliferation due to exposure to a platelet concentrate in vitro is pH dependent. Wound Repair Regen.;10:336–340
  29. Harvey HJ, Miller JM. (2014). Mammary glands. In: Bojrab MJ, Waldron DR, Toombs JP (eds.), Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery .6th ed.Jackson, Wyoming, USA: Teton NewMedia.:590–594
  30. Viste JR, Myers SL, Singh B, Simko E. (2002). Feline mammary adenocarcinoma: tumor size as a prognostic indicator. Can Vet J.;43 (1):33–37.
  31. MacPhail CM. (2013). Surgery of the Integumentary System. In: Fossum TW (ed.), Small Animal Surgery. 4th ed.Missouri, USA: Mosby Inc., Elsevier Inc.: 190–288
  32. Papazoglou LG, Basdani E, Ravidi S, Patsikas MN, Karayiannopoulou M. (2014). Current surgical options for mammary tumor removal in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Science & Medicine.; 2 (1):2–7.
  33. Baba AI, Câtoi C. (2007). Comparative Oncology. Bucharest: The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy;. Chapter 11, Mammary gland tumors. Available from:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9542/
  34. Cornell K. (2012). Wound Healing. In: Tobias KM, Johnston SA, editors. Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal. 1st ed., Missouri, USA: Elsevier Saunders,:125–134
  35. Bohling MW, Henderson RA, Swaim SF, Kincaid SA, Wright JC. (2004). Cutaneous wound healing in the cat: a macroscopic description and comparison with cutaneous wound healing in the dog. Vet Surg;33(6):579–587.
  36. Bohling MW, Henderson RA, Swaim SF, Kincaid SA, Wright JC. (2006). Comparison of the role of the subcutaneous tissues in cutaneous wound healing in the dog and cat. Vet Surg;35(1):3–14.
  37. Pavletic MM. (2010). Basic Principles of Wound Healing. In: Atlas of Small Animal Wound Management and Reconstructive Surgery, 3rd ed. Iowa, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  38. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N. (2005). Tissue renewal and repair: regeneration, healing, and fibrosis. In Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 7th ed., Philadelphia: Saunders, Elsevier,:87–118
  39. Bohling MW, Henderson RA. (2006). Differences in cutaneous wound healing between dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract.;36(4):687-92.
  40. Scott MG, LeGrys VA, Schindler EI. (2014). Electrolytes and blood gases. In: Burtis CA & Bruns DE (eds.), Tietz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics.7th ed. Missouri, USA: Saunders, Elsevier.:412–429
  41. Mathews KA. (2006). Acid-base Assessment. In: Mathews KA (ed.), Veterinary Emergency Critical Care Manual. 2nd ed. Ontario, Canada: Lifelearn Inc.:406–410
  42. Kellum JA. (2000). Determinants of blood pH in health and disease. Critical Care; 4 (1):6-14. doi: 10.1186/cc644.
  43. Hunt TK, Aslam RS, Beckert S, et al. (2007). Aerobically-Derived Lactate Stimulates Revascularization and Tissue Repair via Redox Mechanisms. Antioxidants & redox signaling.; 9(8):1115-1124. doi:10.1089/ars.2007.1674.
  44. Karagiannis MH, Reniker AN, Kerl ME, Mann FA. (2006). Lactate measurement as an indicator of perfusion. Comp Cont Educ Pract.;28:287–298.
  45. Stevenson CK, Kidney BA, Duke T, Snead ECR, Jackson ML. (2007). Evaluation of the Accutrend for lactate measurement in dogs. Vet Clin Pathol.;36 (3):261–266.
  46. Stevenson CK, Kidney BA, Duke T, Snead ECR, Mainar-Jaime RC, Jackson ML. (2007). Serial blood lactate concentrations in systemically ill dogs. Vet Clin Pathol.;36(3):234–239.
  47. Hagman R, Reezigt BJ, Bergström Ledin H, Karlstam E. (2009). Blood lactate levels in 31 female dogs with pyometra. Acta Vet Scand.;51 (2):1–9.
  48. Acierno MJ, Johnson ME, Eddleman LA, Mitchell MA. (2008). Measuring statistical agreement between four point of care (POC) lactate meters and a laboratory blood analyzer in cats. J Feline Med Surg.;10(2):110–114.
  49. Kerl ME. (2010). Acid-Base, Oxymetry, and Blood Gas Emergencies. In: Ettinger SJ & Feldman EC (eds.), Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine. 7th ed. Missouri, USA: Saunders, Elsevier,: 467–471
  50. Gray S, Powell LL. (2012). Blood gas analysis. In: Creedon JMB & Davis H (eds.), Advanced Monitoring and Procedures for Small Animal Emergency and Critical Care.1st ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.:286–292
  51. Gough A. (2007). Differential Diagnosis in Small Animal Medicine. Iowa, USA: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
  52. Irizarry R., Reiss A. (2009). Arterial and venous blood gases: indications, interpretations, and clinical applications. Comp Cont Educ Pract.:1–7.
  53. Jones EM, Cochrane CA, Percival SL. (2015). The Effect of pH on the Extracellular Matrix and Biofilms. Advances in Wound Care; 4(7):431-439. doi:10.1089/wound.2014.0538.
  54. Smith & Nephew (2016) The relationship between pH and wound healing. Le journal PICO. Accessed at: https://www.smith-nephew.com/belgique/produits-old/cadesorb-/cadesorb--simplescience/the-relationship-between-ph-and-wound-healing/
  55. Kitakaze M., Weisfeldt M.L., Marban E. (1988). Acidosis during early reperfusion prevents myocardial stunning in perfused ferret hearts. J. Clin. Invest;82:920–927.
  56. Orchard C.H., Kentish J.C. (1990). Effects of changes of pH on the contractile function of cardiac muscle. Am. J. Physiol.;(258):967–981.
  57. Knighton D.R., Hunt T.K., Banda M.J. (1983). Oxygen tension regulates the expression of angiogenesis factor by macrophages. Science.;(221):1283–1285
  58. Hunt TK., Twomey P., Zederfeldt B., Dunphy JE. (1997). Respiratory gas tensions and pH in healing wounds. Am J Surg;(114):302–307
  59. Gladden LB. (2004). Lactate metabolism: a new paradigm for the third millennium. The Journal of Physiology, (558):5–30. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.058701
  60. Yosipovitch G, Tur E, Morduchowicz G, Boner G. (1993). Skin surface pH, moisture, and pruritus in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant,;8(10):1129-32.
  61. Waugh A, Grant A. (2007). Anatomy and Physiology in Health and Illness. 10th edition. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier
  62. Schwalfenberg GK. (2012). The Alkaline Diet: Is There Evidence That an Alkaline pH Diet Benefits Health? Journal of Environmental and Public Health:727630. doi:10.1155/2012/727630.
  63. Gethin G. (2007). The significance of surface pH in chronic wounds. Wounds UK;3:52–55
  64. Schneider LA., Korber A., Grabbe S., Dissemond J. (2007). Influence of pH on wound-healing: a new perspective for wound-therapy? Arch Dermatol Res.;(298):413–420
  65. Sharpe JR., Harris KL., Jubin K., Bainbridge NJ., Jordan NR. (2009). The effect of pH in modulating skin cell behaviour. Br J Dermatol;(161):671–673